•  
  •  
 

Abstract

From beginning to end, Caleb Williams interrogates the con­struction of narrative, thereby raising a central problem of empiricism: are the stories we tell about the world true? Eval­u­ating William Godwin's novel in terms of its complex rela­tionship to genre situates its critique of narrative squarely in the middle of contemporaneous philosophical debates. The novel is in conversation with an empiricist philosophy that would value coherent narratives above all else. These narratives, the novel suggests, are not only artificial but also epistemologically dan­gerous. Ultimately, they encourage us to accept what is rea­sonable at the expense of what may be true. According to the novel, it is not merely true that narrative is an ineffective mechanism for explaining the world, but that the very debate over Enlightenment questions is unstable.

Contributor's Note

Emily R. Anderson, assistant professor of English at Knox College, has published articles on the relation between Gothic novels and the Enlightenment, and is currently working on film and its narrative strategies.