Author

Peter L. Biro

Date of Award

4-1985

Degree Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Arts (MA)

Department

Political Science

Supervisor

Howard Aster

Language

English

Abstract

This thesis represents an attempt at a philosophical inquiry into the nature of political action and its place in liberal theory.

I begin by considering whether action must be explained teleologically and whether non-purposive accounts of behaviour can be generally adequate. In finding that purposive behaviour fundamentally characterizes action, I question the assumption in liberal political theory, beginning with Hobbes, that mechanistic laws of behaviour can provide man with a science of politics.

Hobbes , represents for me, the first stage in the revolt against teleological politics. I consider the important contributions that Immanuel Kant and finally John Rawls make to the liberalism of anti-telelogical politics.

I then consider the liberal critique of Hobbes' portrait of man. This is represented by Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Rousseau's critique is undermined by his failure to reject market politics.

Finally, I consider the market-model of society, which is seen to be the ultimate embodiment of mechanistic, anti-teleological politics.

McMaster University Library



Share

COinS